In today’s fast-moving world, artificial intelligence has become a valuable tool for many writers, journalists and communication professionals. While AI can help create articles, columns and press releases, it falls short in one important area, the ability to infuse genuine human emotions and deep personal experiences into words. This limitation means that while AI is a useful assistant, it cannot truly replace human authors, writers and intellectuals.
When we look at how AI writes, we can see both its strengths and weaknesses. AI systems can quickly gather information, organize ideas and create well-structured content. They can check grammar, suggest better word choices, and even help make writing clearer. For busy professionals working on press releases or news articles, this can save precious time and help them meet tight deadlines.
Think about a newspaper office where journalists are rushing to cover multiple stories. AI can help them draft initial reports, gather basic facts and create simple news updates. This gives reporters more time to focus on in-depth investigation, conducting interviews and adding the human touch to their stories. Similarly, public relations professionals can use AI to create first drafts of press releases, letting them spend more time on strategy and building relationships with their audiences.
However, writing is much more than just putting words together in the right order. True writing comes from human experiences, feelings and understanding. When we read a moving novel, we connect with the author’s personal journey, their struggles, their joys and their unique view of the world. AI cannot draw from real-life experiences because it has none. It can only work with patterns it finds in existing text.
Consider a column about losing a loved one. A human writer who has gone through this experience can share their raw emotions, their specific memories and the small, meaningful moments that made their relationship special. They can describe the weight of grief in ways that resonate with readers who have felt the same pain. AI, on the other hand, can only create general descriptions based on what others have written. It cannot truly understand or convey the depth of such human experiences.
The same goes for intellectual discourse. While AI can summarize existing arguments and combine different viewpoints, it cannot create truly original thoughts or challenge established ideas in meaningful ways. Human intellectuals bring their unique perspectives, shaped by years of study, personal experiences and deep reflection. They can see connections that others miss and propose new ways of thinking that come from their genuine engagement with ideas.
Take a philosopher writing about happiness. Their thoughts might be influenced by their own life journey, conversations with others and years of observing human behavior. They might challenge common beliefs based on their personal insights and real-world observations. AI can process existing philosophy texts, but it cannot contribute new wisdom born from lived experience.
Writers also know their audiences in ways that AI cannot. They understand the subtle cultural references that will resonate with their readers, the local contexts that matter and the emotional undertones that make writing powerful. A local columnist writing about their community brings years of personal connections and understanding that AI simply cannot match.
Moreover, human writers can adapt and respond to changing situations with genuine empathy and understanding. During times of crisis or celebration, they can capture the mood of their community because they are part of it. They feel what their readers feel and can express those emotions authentically. AI might be able to identify patterns in how people write about such events, but it cannot truly share in these collective human experiences.
The creative process itself is deeply personal and often messy in ways that AI cannot replicate. Writers often discover what they really want to say as they write, changing direction as new thoughts emerge. Their best ideas might come from random connections, dreams or conversations with friends. This organic, unpredictable creative process leads to unique and powerful writing that touches readers in unexpected ways.
Looking ahead, we should see AI as a helpful tool that can make writing tasks easier and more efficient. It can handle routine writing tasks, help with research, and suggest improvements to our work. This support allows human writers to focus more on the aspects of writing that truly require human touch, sharing genuine emotions, offering unique insights and connecting with readers on a personal level.
For new writers and professionals, AI can be particularly helpful as a learning tool. It can show them different ways to structure their writing, suggest improvements and help them develop their skills. However they should remember that their own voices, experiences and emotions are what will make their writing truly valuable and unique.
The rise of AI in writing should not worry good writers and thinkers. Instead of worrying it should remind us of what makes human writing special, our ability to share real emotions, create genuine connections and offer truly original thoughts. While AI can help with the mechanics of writing, the heart and soul of meaningful writing will always come from human experiences and understanding.
While AI is becoming a useful tool in writing, it cannot replace the emotional depth, personal experience and original thinking that human writers bring to their work. The future of writing will likely involve collaboration between humans and AI, where each contributes what they do best. AI can handle the routine aspects of writing, leaving humans free to focus on what they do uniquely well, creating content that truly touches hearts and minds through genuine emotion and lived experience.
ZAMAN NOOR
Writer is an Independent Public Opinion Analyst, Columnist and Actively Engaged in Peace Activism.
can be reached at [email protected]
