The Supreme Court on Thursday asked the Centre why couldn’t it say its doors were open and it would consider the genuine grievances of farmers protesting over various demands, including the legal guarantee of minimum support price for crops.
Further, a bench of Justices Surya Kant and Ujjal Bhuyan asked the Centre to respond to the fresh plea filed on behalf of farmer leader Jagjit Singh Dallewal seeking direction to the Union government for implementation of the proposal, including a legal guarantee of MSP on crops, made to the protesting farmers in 2021, after the farm laws were repealed.
“Why can’t your client make a statement that it will consider the genuine demands and we are open to discuss the grievances of farmers, our doors are open? Why can’t the Central government make a statement?” the bench asked solicitor general Tushar Mehta.
“Perhaps the court is not aware of various factors weighing in,” he said, “therefore, right now we are confining ourselves to the issue of health of one individual. The Central government is concerned with each and every farmer.” Petitioner in-person Guninder Kaur Gill, who filed the fresh plea on behalf of Mr Dallewal, was asked not to adopt a confrontational approach as the court had constituted a high-powered committee headed by retired high court judge to deal with various such issues.
“You are asking for compliance of the proposal. How can we direct the compliance of the proposal? You have to bring something more on record. We are issuing notice on this. But think of something. Let us not go with the confrontation… Please don’t think of confrontation,” said the bench.
Ms Gill said the issue was resolved in 2021, when a proposal for the guarantee was adopted.
“The matter was already resolved into a guarantee. Last two-three lines of the proposal make it amply clear that it was a guarantee on the part of the Central government… It was a commitment and a promise on the basis of which the farmers withdrew their andolan (agitation). Now, they (Centre) cannot go back,” she said.
Committee after committee were being constituted to resolve the same issues, added Ms Gill.
The court said it had “full faith” in the committee, headed by a former judge who, in a way, had roots in the agriculture sector from both Punjab and Haryana.
“We have included experts from Punjab and Haryana, who are agriculturist, economist and professors. They are all learned, neutral fellows and their names came from both sides. Now that the committee is there, why are you not moving through a platform? We cannot directly have dialogue with the farmers. Probably, the central government, whatever may be the good or bad reasons, it is for them to take a decision,” said Justice Surya Kant.
The bench directed a copy of the petition to be served upon the member secretary of the high-powered committee, which is likely to hold talks with the protesting farmers and other stakeholders on December 3.
It asked the Centre and the committee to file their responses to the fresh petition filed on behalf of Mr Dallewal within 10 days.
Mr Dallewal has been on an indefinite fast at the Khanauri border point between Punjab and Haryana since November 26 to press the Centre to accept the farmers’ various demands.
The farmers under the banner of Samyukta Kisan Morcha (non-political) and Kisan Mazdoor Morcha have been camping at Shambhu and Khanauri border points between Punjab and Haryana since February 13, 2024, after their march to Delhi was stopped by the security forces. PTI
