Post-abrogation of Article 370, the Union Territories of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh have witnessed profound affirmative and progressive changes encompassing their entire governance, including developmental activities and security, said Minister of State Nityanand Rai to Rajya Sabha in a written reply.
“The government is fully committed to the overall development of the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir and the Union Territory of Ladakh. It has taken several initiatives for socio-economic development and good governance during the last few years by creating a conducive environment for securing all-round development and bringing peace and prosperity to the people of both Union Territories” read the statement written reply to Rajya Sabha by MoS Home Nityanand Rai.
Meanwhile, BJP MP from Ladakh, Jamyang Namgyal, on Tuesday made a strong case for status quo to continue under the UT administration saying that the erstwhile state needs peace, security and progress more than polls.
The discussion on two Bills on the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir in the Lok Sabha, on Day 2 of the ongoing Winter Session of Parliament, saw a heated debate between the Treasury and the Opposition benches, with veteran TMC MP Saugata Roy demanding that the Centre set a definite time frame for holding Assembly polls in the UT.
Countering the TMC MP and other opposition members, Namgyal said, “Former chief minister of Jammu and Kashmir, Farooq (Abdullah) ji, is here, and with all due respect, I want to ask him: How many elections have you witnessed in your lifetime? Has there been a single election that was conducted peacefully, without guns and bombs going off and lives lost?”
Quoting Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Namgyal said “only if there’s life, there is a world”, adding that the Union Territory needs peace and security more than elections at this point.
“We can’t hold elections by putting people’s lives at risk. There can be no elections at the cost of national security or public safety,” the BJP MP argued.
In a swipe at previous regimes in the erstwhile state, Namgyal said, “Back in the day, one was terrified visiting Kashmir, especially the South Kashmir region, which used to be the hotbed of militancy and terror. At the back of our minds, there used to be a gnawing fear that we might not return alive. In a region where guns rang out and bombs went off previously, there’s a reign of peace now. Shooting guns have now been replaced with film shoots. Even the people of South Kashmir would endorse my words. At a place where curfews had to be enforced for months on end, shop owners now stay open days and nights without any disturbance.”
Several members took part in the debate in the Lower House on Tuesday and Union Home Minister Amit Shah is expected to give his reply on Wednesday.
Taking turns at addressing the House during the debate, opposition members accused the government of delaying elections in Jammu and Kashmir, adding that while the Centre was claiming a significant improvement in the law and order situation in the erstwhile state, it was dragging its feet on holding the assembly polls.
The Lower House took two Bills–the Jammu and Kashmir Reservation (Amendment) Bill, 2023 and the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation (Amendment) Bill, 2023–up for discussion and debate on Tuesday.
The Union Home Minister tabled the two Bills for consideration and passage in the Lok Sabha. The House took the two Bills up for debate together.
Participating in the debate, National Conference MP Hasnain Masoodi said the draft legislations should not have been introduced at this stage, as the Supreme Court was yet to announce its verdict on the petitions challenging the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganization Act.
He said the decisions on matters, being sought to be amended by the Bills, were taken by the erstwhile Assembly and any changes should be made there. (Agencies)
